State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
states following
February 2023
most recently cited
36 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Neder v. United States · 131 Wis. 2d 246 - State v. Bangert · State v. Harvey · 159 Wis. 2d 561 - State v. Livingston · State v. Hauk
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[The defendant] was never informed that he had a constitutional right to a jury determination of the drug quantity, nor was he ever given the opportunity to waive or invoke that right. Accordingly, we hold that Smith did not waive his constitutional right to a jury determination of the drug quantity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Soto“clear beyond a reasonable doubt that a rational jury would have found [Thomas] guilty absent the error.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.