In Re Lefebvre’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Dubois v. Maine Employment Security Commission · In re Stanley · Matthews v. R. T. Allen & Sons, Inc. · 177 Pa. Super. 439 - Garner v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission · Public Utilities Commission v. Johnson Motor Transport
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Once inadequacy of existing service is determined the Commission may, in its discretion, authorize competition and need not limit the new carrier to providing service restricted to areas of specific demonstrated inadequacy. . . . The Commission has broad discretion in deciding to what extent competition would serve the public interest. . . .” (Citations omitted.) 343 A.2d at 210 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Powell““The Commission may permit competition, having broad discretion when deciding to what extent competition is needed and its probable effect on existing carriers.” In re Lefebvre, 343 A.2d at 208 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Powell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.