Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 343 A2D 204 - In Re Lefebvre

In Re Lefebvre’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 1985
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Dubois v. Maine Employment Security Commission · In re Stanley · Matthews v. R. T. Allen & Sons, Inc. · 177 Pa. Super. 439 - Garner v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission · Public Utilities Commission v. Johnson Motor Transport

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Once inadequacy of existing service is determined the Commission may, in its discretion, authorize competition and need not limit the new carrier to providing service restricted to areas of specific demonstrated inadequacy. . . . The Commission has broad discretion in deciding to what extent competition would serve the public interest. . . .” (Citations omitted.) 343 A.2d at 210 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““The Commission may permit competition, having broad discretion when deciding to what extent competition is needed and its probable effect on existing carriers.” In re Lefebvre, 343 A.2d at 208 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.