Norrell v. Giles’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently January 2021
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pugh v. Griggs · Beverly Enterprises-Arkansas, Inc. v. Hillier · Blaylock v. Shearson Lehman Bros., Inc. · Lemon v. Laws · Whetstone v. Chadduck
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Effect of Admission. Any matter admitted under this rale is conclusively established unless the court on motion permits withdrawal or amendment of the admission. . . . Any admission made by a party under this rule is for the purpose of the pending action only and is not an admission by him for any other purpose, nor may it be used against him in any other proceeding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Head v. Giles“the rule does not speak in terms of 'any action involving the same claim' or 'any action involving the same parties'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mehman v. Noltemeyer“the matters that were deemed admitted by Appellant in the first action were of no effect in the second action”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mehman v. Noltemeyer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.