United States v. McMaster’s Empirical Analysis
343 F.2d 176 · 1965
Citation profile
23 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2009 · most notably Chapman v. State of California (1967), United States v. Dandy (1993)
23 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kotteakos v. United States · Berger v. United States · Krulewitch v. United States · Lutwak v. United States · United States v. Ryan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[T]his was not a conspiracy case. Wolff [the co-defendant] was not an agent of McMaster and the statement (admissible as to Wolff) was not admissible as to McMaster.” Id., 343 F.2d at 182 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.