Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

343 F.2d 321

Docket No. 18762.

Booth v. United States

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Dec. 21, 1964.

Decided Feb. 4, 1965.

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1965-02-04

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently December 2004

1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1965-02-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Mr. James E. Greeley (appointed by this court), Washington, D. C., for appellant.

¶2Mr. Daniel H. Benson, Atty., Dept, of Justice, with whom Messrs. David C. Acheson, U. S. Atty., Frank Q. Nébeker and David Epstein, Asst. U. S. Attys., were on the brief, for appellee.

¶3Before Bazelon, Chief Judge, and Fahy and McGowan, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM:

¶5Appellant conceded his part in the altercation which led to his conviction for assault with a deadly weapon. Although he presented a substantial claim of self-defense, the jury rejected it, as it had a right to do, under a charge which scrupulously alerted the jury to testimony which would support acquittal.

¶6Appellant urges on appeal, but did not below, that he was arrested without probable cause, and that an illegally seized knife was admitted in evidence against him. On the record in this case, we find no merit in these contentions. Nor do we think that the three and one-half month delay between indictment and trial violates the constitutional guarantee of speedy trial in the particular circumstances here.

¶7Affirmed.

/343/f2d/321 · .json · Public domain