Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

343 F.2d 473

Docket No. 21833.

Moore v. Calhoon

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1965-03-31

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently May 2024

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1965-03-31

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Joseph J. Laura, Jr., Laura, Danna & Simmons, New Orleans, La., for appellants.

Thomas J. Meunier, New Orleans, La., Lee Pressman, David Scribner, Pressman & Scribner, New York City, for defendants-appellees, Joan Stern Kiok, of counsel.

Before WOODBURY,1 WISDOM and BELL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

It appearing without dispute that defendants in the court below followed the statute, 29 U.S.C.A. 411(a)(3)(A)(ii), and complied with the union's natioinal constitution on the dues increase question, the entry of summary judgment was correct.

¶2

Affirmed.

1

Of the First Circuit, sitting by designation

/343/f2d/473 · .json · Public domain