Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 343 F.2d 951 - Brock & Blevins Co. v. United States

Brock & Blevins Co. v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

343 F.2d 951 · 1965

Citation profile

92
cited by 92 later decisions
March 2018
most recently cited

4 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 92 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably International Union United Automobile Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America Uaw v. Yard-Man Incorporated (1983), United States v. Johnson Controls, Inc. (1983)

4 federal appellate ·

250196519701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cannon Construction Co. v. United States · Courant v. International Photographers of the Motion Picture Industry, Local 659 · Nevada Half Moon Mining Co. v. Combined Metals Reduction Co. · Seeds v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 92 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The essential elements of an effective accord and satisfaction are proper subject matter, competent parties, meeting of the minds of the parties, and consideration. And its most common pattern is a mutual agreement between the parties in which one pays or performs and the other accepts payment or performance in satisfaction of a claim or demand which is a bona fide dispute.””
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A claim is discharged by the doctrine of accord and satisfaction when `some performance different from that which was claimed as due is rendered and such substituted performance is accepted by the claimant as full satisfaction of his claim.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.