Dallio v. Spitzer’s Empirical Analysis
343 F.3d 553 · 2003
Citation profile
30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
July 2019
most recently cited
7 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Johnson v. Zerbst · Williams v. Taylor · Faretta v. California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that ideally a trial court should hold a hearing to advise a criminal defendant on the dangers of proceeding pro se,” but concluding that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a state court decision need not mention a particular argument or explain the reasons for rejecting it,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.