Tueros v. Greiner’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

9 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “If Sullivan by its own terms were to apply to cases other than multiple representation cases, the Supreme Court could not retroactively `un-establish' this clear law in dicta, because the command of § 2254(d) indicates that we are only able to consider the holdings of Supreme Court cases decided at the time of the state court conviction.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Schwab v. Crosby

2. “fail[ed] to extend a principle of clearly established law to situations which that principle should have, in reason, governed,”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Scrimo v. Lee

3. “review[s] a district court's denial of habeas relief de novo, but we review its findings of fact only for clear error.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Marrero Pichardo v. Ashcroft