Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

343 F.3d 950

Docket Nos. 01-1537, 01-1538.

Whitfield v. Bowersox

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Sept. 2, 2003.

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 2003-09-02

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently April 2017

2 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on State v. Whitfield · Whitfield v. Bowersox · United States v. Sell

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2003-09-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Cheryl Ann Pilate, Charles M. Rogers, Wyrsch & Hobbs, Kansas City, MO, Joseph E. Whitfield, pro se, Mineral Point, MO, for Petitioner-Appellee.

¶2Stephen David Hawke, Attorney General’s Office, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondents-Appellants.

¶3On June 17, 2003, the Supreme Court of Missouri, in State v. Whitfield, 107 S.W.3d 253, 256 (Mo.2003), recalled its mandate and set aside Whitfield’s death sentence. The Missouri Supreme Court resentenced “Whitfield “to life imprisonment without eligibility for probation, parole, or release except by act of the Governor.” Id. at 272. Based on the Missouri Supreme Court’s action, we vacate sections III.B. and III. C.l of our panel opinion as moot. Whitfield v. Bowersox, 324 F.3d 1009 (8th Cir.2003). We also vacate as moot that portion of the district court’s January 24, 2001, Memorandum and Order granting Whitfield a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on Whitfield’s Ground III.C. relating to Whitfield’s death sentence. Whitfield’s petition for rehearing by the panel is otherwise denied. The petition for rehearing en banc is denied.

/343/f3d/950 · .json · Public domain