Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 343 FSUPP2D 1 - Crowell v. Ionics, Inc.

Crowell v. Ionics, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
June 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 17 district ·

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78A (§ 1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78U (§ 21d of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1391

Relies on Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder · Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Basic Inc. v. Levinson · Bowsher v. Synar · Clinton v. City of New York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “as long as the statements allegedly made were in furtherance of a common scheme to defraud.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In other words, because Summa Four issued the letter after Gross had purchased his stock, the statements in the letter could not possibly have inflated the market price that he paid for those shares. Moreover, although Gross purports to bring a class action on behalf of all individuals who purchased Summa Four shares during the class period, he cannot maintain an action on behalf of class members to redress an injury for which he has no standing in his own right.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “A highly unreasonable omission, involving not merely simple, or even inexcusable, negligence, but an extreme departure from the standards of ordinary care, and which presents a danger of misleading buyers or sellers that is either known to the defendant or is so obvious the actor must have been aware of it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.