Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 343 Ill. App. 31 - Jackson v. Jackson

343 Ill. App. 31 - Jackson v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis

1951

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
4
states following
March 1995
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently March 1995

15 state decisions

4019511960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Golden v. Cervenka · Wylie v. Bushnell · Lowenberg v. Booth · Duncan v. Dazey · Groome v. Freyn Engineering Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * the duty of a fiduciary to account is not discharged by submitting books of account, no matter how voluminous; nor is it discharged by the voluntary submission of those books to numerous accountants’ examinations, no matter how searching. The fiduciary’s duty requires that he go further and disclose all the facts within and outside the records which bear on the deceased partner’s interest.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““A court of equity has broad discretion in the matter of interest. [Citations.] ‘In equity * * * interest is allowed because of equitable considerations, and is given or withheld as under all the circumstances of the case seems equitable and just.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “"We do not mean to ask for briefs barren of all literary zeal and pungency. What we suggest is that the condiment be used with discretion and not in doses that make the whole dish unpalatable.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.