Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 343 Ill. App. 3d 708 - Bale v. Barnhart

343 Ill. App. 3d 708 - Bale v. Barnhart’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
March 2024
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 2024

10 state decisions

60200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 156 Ill. 2d 112 - Kedzie and 103rd Currency Exchange, Inc. v. Hodge · 138 Ill. 2d 458 - Marsh v. Evangelical Covenant Church · 184 Ill. 2d 109 - Cirrincione v. Johnson · 186 Ill. 2d 181 - Davis v. Toshiba MacH. Co., America · Epstein v. Chicago Board of Education

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “as required by section 7 where each of the recorded and registered notices describe a December 7, 1989 subcontract and the complaint for foreclosure refers to a November 24, 1989 written contract. These cases stand for the proposition that improper identification of a party to a contract fails to provide the requisite”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “there was no final judgment because the order *** left unresolved the issue of attorney fees–an issue raised in the pleadings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Absent a final judgment, we lack jurisdiction over [appellant's] appeal under Rule 303.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.