State v. Scott’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
92 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 92 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably State v. Nobles (1999), State v. Locklear (1998)
92 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Katz v. United States · Bell v. Wolfish · United States v. Cortez · United States v. Brignoni-Ponce
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 92 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"`objectively that grounds ... exist ... consist[ing] of substantial evidence that there exists such a personal bias, prejudice or interest on the part of the judge that he would be unable to rule impartially.'" The bias, prejudice, or interest which requires a trial judge to be recused from a trial has reference to the personal disposition or mental attitude of the trial judge, either favorable or unfavorable, toward a party to the action before him.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“(1) [A] judge should disqualify himself in a proceeding in which his impartiality may reasonably be questioned, including but not limited to instances where: (a) He has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party, or personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts concerning the proceedings[.]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“'[i]t must always be remembered that what the Constitution forbids is not all searches and seizures, but unreasonable searches and seizures.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.