Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 343 N.C. 436 - State v. Francis

State v. Francis’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
November 2013
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently November 2013

8 state decisions

40199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Coffey · State v. Ramey · State v. McDowell · State v. Detter · State v. Farmer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““prior statements of a witness can be admitted as corroborative evidence if they tend to add weight or credibility to the witness’ trial testimony. New information contained within the witness’ prior statement, but not referred to in his trial testimony, may also be admitted as corroborative evidence if it tends to add weight or credibility to that testimony.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “constituted reversible error in that there was a reasonable possibility that a different result would have beenreached had the pretrial statement not been admitted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.