Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 343 N.C. 564 - State v. Bates

State v. Bates’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
April 2016
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently April 2016

18 state decisions

150199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Batson v. Kentucky · JEB v. Alabama Ex Rel. TB · State v. Odom · State v. Benson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]t is appropriate when the level of brutality involved exceeds that normally found in first-degree murders or when the murder in question is conscienceless, pitiless, or unnecessarily torturous to the victim. It also arises when the killing demonstrates an unusual depravity of mind on the part of the defendant. Among the types of murders that meet the above criteria are those that are physically agonizing or otherwise dehumanizing to the victim and those that are less violent but involve the infliction of psychological torture.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[i]f the evidence is sufficient to fully satisfy the State’s burden of proving each and every element of the offense of murder in the first degree, including premeditation and deliberation, and there is no evidence to negate these elements other than defendant’s denial that he committed the offense, the trial [court] should properly exclude from jury consideration the possibility of a conviction of second degree murder.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the prosecutor commented on the demeanor of the defendant, which was before the jury at all times. Such statements are not comparable to those which this Court has previously held to be improper comments on a defendant's failure to testify.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.