Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 343 P.3d 1282 - WATSON v. STATE

WATSON v. STATE’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 2016
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Smith v. State · STATE ex rel. SMITH v. NEUWIRTH

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]e find a procedural bar like the one found in Section 1086 of the Uniform Post-Conviction Act may be utilized by the courts on any second or subsequent application for post-conviction relief requesting DNA testing under the Postconviction DNA Act.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. FLOWERS v. STATE
  2. “the procedure for any appeal under the Postconviction DNA Act is the same as an appeal to this Court under the Uniform Post-Conviction Act.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. FLOWERS v. STATE
  3. “notwithstanding any other provision of law concerning post-conviction relief”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. FLOWERS v. STATE

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.