Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 343 Pa. Super. 486 - Commonwealth v. Rodriguez

343 Pa. Super. 486 - Commonwealth v. Rodriguez’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
3
states following
December 2004
most recently cited

42 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently December 2004 · most notably State v. Miller (1987), Commonwealth v. Dunkle (1992)

42 state decisions

200198519902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Kloiber · Commonwealth v. Young · 282 Pa. Super. 431 - Commonwealth v. Niemetz · Commonwealth v. Cartagena · 243 Pa. Super. 208 - Commonwealth v. Bradley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Evidence of the alleged victim's `hue and cry' following rape has long been admissible at common law. Hue and cry is thought to follow rape like smoke follows fire. Proof of the former is circumstantial evidence of the latter. Conversely, unexplained lack of evidence of hue and cry that one might expect to ensue from rape casts doubts on the existence of the rape itself. Fresh complaints of rape, undetailed, are a particular form of hue and cry that provides significant circumstantial support for the alleged victim's subsequent testimony that she was raped. Such fresh complaints are classified evidentially as prior consistent statements.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.