Ward v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
42 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Davis v. Michigan Department of the Treasury · McKesson Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, Fla. Dept. of Business Regulation · Roos v. Bancfirst of Sulphur · Palmetto Alliance, Inc. v. South Carolina Public Service Commission · Dove v. Gold Kist, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is distinct from the doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies, which 'is generally considered a rule of policy, convenience and discretion, rather than one of law, and is not jurisdictional.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“ALJs [cannot] rule on the validity of a statute. However, an agency or ALJ can still rule on whether a party's constitutional rights have been violated.... [M]erely asserting an alleged constitutional violation will not allow a party to avoid an administrative ruling.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Surely, the circuit court has the jurisdiction to hear declaratory judgment actions on the constitutionality of statutes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.