Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

343 S.C. 486

In re Olivetti

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 10, 2001

Supreme Court of South Carolina · decided 2001-01-10

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently September 2003

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-01-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

¶2The Office of Disciplinary Counsel has filed a petition asking the Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, because he poses a threat of serious harm to the public or to the administration of justice. The petition also seeks appointment of an attorney to protect the interests of respondent’s clients pursuant to Rule 31, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR.

¶3IT IS ORDERED that the petition is granted and respondent is suspended from the practice of law in this State until further order of this Court.

¶4IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that James P. Scheider, Jr., Esquire, is appointed to assume responsibility for respondent’s client files, trust aecount(s), escrow aceount(s), operating ac*487count(s), and any other law office accounts respondent may maintain. Mr. Scheider shall take action as required by Rule 31, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, to protect the interests of respondent’s clients. Mr. Scheider may make disbursements from respondent’s trust account(s), escrow account(s), operating aceount(s), and any other law office accounts respondent may maintain that are necessary to effectuate this appointment.

¶5This Order, when served on any bank or other financial institution maintaining trust, escrow and/or operating accounts) of respondent, shall serve as an injunction to prevent respondent from making withdrawals from the account(s) and shall further serve as notice to the bank or other financial institution that James P. Scheider, Jr., Esquire, has been duly appointed by this Court.

¶6Finally, this Order, when served on any office of the United States Postal Service, shall serve as notice that James P. Scheider, Jr., Esquire, has been duly appointed by this Court and has the authority to receive respondent’s mail and the authority to direct that respondent’s mail be delivered to Mr. Scheider’s office.

/s/ Jean H. Toal, C.J.FOR THE COURT
/343/sc/486 · .json · Public domain