State v. Salisbury’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
November 2014
most recently cited
18 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Grippon · State v. Lewis · Nichols v. State · State v. Moorer · State v. Baker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) influence of alcohol to the extent that the person’s faculties to drive are materially and appreciably impaired; (2) influence of any other drug or a combination of other drugs or substances which cause impairment to the extent that the person’s faculties to drive are materially and appreciably impaired; or (3) combined influence of alcohol and any other drug or drugs, or substances which cause impairment to the extent that the person’s faculties to drive are materially and appreciably impaired.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Knuckles“evidence based on actual knowledge and proves a fact without inference or presumption.” State v. Salisbury, 343 S.C. 520 , 524 n. 1, 541 S.E.2d 247 , 248-49 n. 1 (2001). Circumstantial evidence”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Stuckey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.