Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 343 SO2D 605 - State v. Wershow

State v. Wershow’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

71
cited by 71 later decisions
3
states following
November 2015
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 69 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 71 later decisions — most recently November 2015 · most notably 515 So. 2d 161 - Carawan v. State (1987), 438 So. 2d 1 - Palmer v. State (1983)

1 federal appellate · 69 state decisions

26019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Screws v. United States · Cramp v. Board of Public Instruction of Orange Cty. · United States v. Reese · Yu Cong Eng v. Trinidad · Brock v. Hardie

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The requirements of due process of Article I, Section 9, Florida Constitution, and the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States are not fulfilled unless the Legislature, in the promulgation of a penal statute, uses language sufficiently definite to apprise those to whom it applies what conduct on their part is prohibited. It is constitutionally impermissible for the Legislature to use such vague and broad language that a person of common intelligence must speculate about its meaning and be subjected to arrest and punishment if the guess is wrong.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`nothing that is not clearly and intelligently described in [a penal statute's] very words, as well as manifestly intended by the Legislature, is to be considered as included within its terms.'”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “in favor of the citizen and against the state.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.