Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

343 So. 2d 93

Docket No. 76-597.

Butler v. State

James BUTLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1977-03-08

Relies on Williams v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1977-03-08

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently November 1991

7 state decisions

40197719801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1William J. Brown, Miami, for appellant.

¶2Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Ira N. Loewy, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

¶3*94 Before HENDRY, C.J., and PEARSON and BARKDULL, JJ.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Appellant, James Butler, was charged in a four-count information as follows: conspiracy to commit robbery, Count One; aggravated assault, Count Two; robbery, Count Three; and unlawful possession of a firearm while engaged in a criminal transaction, Count Four.

¶6A jury found him guilty as to all counts of the information. The court sentenced him to consecutive prison terms of fifteen (15) years, fifteen (15) years, and ninety-nine (99) years on Counts One, Two and Three, respectively; as to Count Four, he was sentenced to fifteen (15) years to run concurrently with the sentence imposed as to Count Three. This appeal is from the judgment and sentences.

¶7We have carefully considered the record on appeal, briefs and arguments of counsel and are of the opinion that the judgment appealed is substantially free of error and should be affirmed. We note, however, that aggravated assault, Section 784.021, Florida Statutes (1975) is a felony of the third degree carrying a sentence not exceeding five (5) years. Section 775.082, Florida Statutes (1975).

¶8In exceeding the maximum sentence allowed for that particular crime, we believe the trial judge committed fundamental error which should be corrected, notwithstanding the failure of appellant to raise the illegality of his sentence in the trial court. Williams v. State,280 So.2d 518 (Fla.3d DCA 1973).

¶9As pertains to Count Two, aggravated assault, the sentence imposed is reversed and remanded with directions to resentence appellant in accordance with the applicable statutory limitations. In all other respects, the judgment and sentences are affirmed.

¶10Affirmed in part; reversed and remanded in part.

/343/so2d/93 · .json · Public domain