¶1Appellants sought relief by habeas corpus to prevent their removal to the State of Mississippi under an extradition warrant.
¶2It is made to appear that after giving notice of appeal from the order remanding them to custody for extradition, appellants entered into recognizance on appeal and returned to the demanding state where they were apprehended and are now in custody.
¶3For the reason stated, the questions raised on these appeals are moot.
¶4The appeals are dismissed.