Manzara v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
28
cited by 28 later decisions
2
states following
July 2019
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 26 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 42
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Flast v. Cohen · Massachusetts v. Mellon · Kelo v. City of New London · Thummel v. King
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) a direct expenditure of funds generated through taxation; (2) an increased levy in taxes; or (3) a pecuniary loss attributable to the challenged transaction of a municipality.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“a sum paid out, without any intervening agency or step, of money or other liquid assets that come into existence through the means by which the state obtains the revenue required for its activities.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“Standing is a question of law, which is reviewed de novo.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.