Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 343 U.S. 205 - Uebersee Finanz-Korporation, A. G. v. McGrath

Uebersee Finanz-Korporation, A. G. v. McGrath’s Empirical Analysis

1952

Citation profile

79
cited by 79 later decisions
8
cited 8 times by the Supreme Court
February 2007
most recently cited

41 federal appellate · 9 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 79 later decisions (8 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2007 · most notably Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. Rogers (1958), Kaufman v. Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. (1952)

41 federal appellate · 9 district ·

360195219601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedUebersee Finanz-Korporation, A. G. v. McGrath (from District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Hormel v. Helvering · Clark v. Uebersee Finanz-Korp. · Miller v. United States · Kaufman v. Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 79 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* *' * As construed by this Court in Clark v. Uebersee Finanz-Korp., A.G., supra, [ 332 U.S. 480 , 68 S.Ct. 174 , 92 L.Ed. 88 ] § 2 included in the word “enemy” all corporations affected with an “enemy taint.” Since we find petitioner to be so affected because of the direct and indirect control and domination by an enemy national, Wilhelm von Opel, petitioner cannot recover under § 9(a). [343 U.S. at 212, 72 S.Ct. at 621.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.