Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 344 ARK 368 - Fewell v. Pickens

Fewell v. Pickens’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 2019
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Smith v. Walt Bennett Ford, Inc. · Continental Insurance Companies v. Stanley · Seeco, Inc. v. Hales · Pearson v. Henrickson · Arkansas Highway Police v. Crittenden County Prosecuting Attorney's Office

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the Uniform Act establishes a special statutory proceeding for receivership matters and associated injunctions and, as a consequence, the proceedings involved in this matter which are fixed by statute are not controlled by the Arkansas Rules of Civil Procedure. See Ark.R.Civ.P. 81(a).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.