Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 344 BR 754 - In Re Jupiter

In Re Jupiter’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
December 2019
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 4 district ·

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 362

Relies on United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc. · Keene Corp. v. United States · Coleman v. · In Re Jones · In Re Paschal

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In a chapter 13 setting, property of the estate encompasses nearly all of a debtor's valuable assets pursuant to § 1306.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Smith v. State (In re Smith) · Smith v. ME Bureau of Revenue Services
  2. “the stay under subsection (a) shall not go into effect upon the filing of the [third or subsequent] case.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Smith v. State (In re Smith) · In Re Jumpp
  3. “state law prohibits a creditor from satisfying any judgment it obtains against”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Smith v. State (In re Smith) · Smith v. ME Bureau of Revenue Services

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.