In Re Lehosit’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 350 · 11 U.S.C. § 521 · 11 U.S.C. § 541 · 11 U.S.C. § 554
Relies on Goodman v. Phillip R. Curtis Enterprises, Inc. · Vreugdenhill v. Navistar International Transportation Corp. · Reed Schwaber v. Reed T Reed a Schwaber · Webb v. Raleigh Hardware Co. · Stanley v. Sherwin-Williams Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[e]ven after a case is closed, an estate continues to retain its interest in unscheduled property. One consequence of this principle is that a debtor may be unable to assert a cause of action after the bankruptcy if the cause of action was not scheduled. In re Wilson, 94 B.R. 886, 892 (Bankr.E.D.Va.1989). Therefore, before a debtor seeks to enforce such a cause of action, he may be required to reopen the bankruptcy case, in order to give the trustee an opportunity to pursue or abandon the cause of action. In re Cundiff, 227 B.R. 476 (6th Cir. BAP 1998).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.