Laughlin v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
344 F.2d 187 · 1965
Citation profile
42 federal appellate · 3 district · 24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 78 later decisions — most recently July 2015 · most notably Smuck v. Hobson (1969), Wingate v. Wainwright (1972)
42 federal appellate · 3 district · 24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1503 · 18 U.S.C. § 3731 · 28 U.S.C. § 144 · 47 U.S.C. § 605
Relies on Jackson v. Denno · Green v. United States · Fahy v. Connecticut · Yates v. United States · Frank v. Mangum
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“those [facts] which the law makes the occasion for imposing its sanctions,” and holding that a trial court’s determination that certain evidence was inadmissible was an”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““In the trial of this case, Laughlin contended that under the doctrine of collateral estoppel the Government should have been precluded from re-litigating the question of whether Mrs. Gross’ consent to the making of the recordings was coerced. The trial court rejected this contention, found that Mrs. Gross’ consent was freely given, and admitted the recordings into evidence.” (pg. 189).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“questions of policy quite different from those applicable to civil proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.