John B. Janigan v. Frederick B. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
344 F.2d 781 · 1965
Citation profile
162 federal appellate · 55 district · 19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 324 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2020 · most notably Blackie v. Barrack (1975), Randall v. Loftsgaarden (1986)
162 federal appellate · 55 district · 19 state decisions — followed in 12 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Holmberg v. Armbrecht · Glidden Company v. Zdanok Et Al. · Bailey Assignee v. Glover et al. · Campbell v. City of Haverhill · Moore v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 324 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]t is more appropriate to give the defrauded party the benefit even of windfalls than to let the fraudulent party keep them.”
25 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a case could be made for any proposition in the world by the simple process of calling one’s adversary and arguing to the jury that he was not to be believed.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“* * * If any artist acquired paints by fraud and used them in producing a valuable portrait we should not suggest that the defrauded party would be entitled to the portrait, or to the proceeds of its sale. However, those limits are not reached in the case at bar. * * * [ 344 F.2d at 787 ].”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.