Marcella v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
344 F.2d 876 · 1965
Citation profile
32 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently August 1996 · most notably Sanders v. Sullivan (1988), United States v. Reynoso-Ulloa (1977)
32 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Hamilton v. Alabama · White v. State of Maryland · Anderson v. Alabama · Baker v. Carr · Western Natural Gas Co. v. Cities Service Gas Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““. . . [T]he movant must show that the testimony was perjured and that the prosecuting officials knew at the time such testimony was used that it was perjured. . . . In addition, the perjured testimony said to have been knowingly used must be particularized definitely.” 344 F.2d at 880 (citations omitted).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Beyond the setting of bail and compliance with Rule 5, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure it does not appear * * * that any further proceedings of any kind took place during that proceeding. There were no pleas, statements or waivers made by appellant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“. [A]ny offense against the United States begun in one district and completed in another, or committed in more than one district, may be inquired of and prosecuted in any district in which such offense was begun, continued, or completed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.