Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 344 F.3d 126 - In Re: Rowanoak Corporation

In Re: Rowanoak Corporation’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
February 2024
most recently cited

2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 2024

2 state decisions

60200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Seagram Distillers Co. v. Alcoholic Beverages Control Commission · Reich v. Newspapers of New England, Inc. · First National Bank v. Minnesota Utility Contracting, Inc. (In Re Minnesota Utility Contracting, Inc.) · Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. v. Senty (In Re Senty)

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the Trustee undisputably has the burden of proving the transfers were fraudulent, and this burden never shifts to [principal’s mother].”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A transfer made or obligation incurred by a debtor is fraudulent as to a creditor . . . if the debtor made the transfer or incurred the obligation: . . . without receiving a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the transfer or obligation, and the debtor: (i) engaged or was about to engage in a business or a transaction for which the remaining assets of the debtor were unreasonably small in relation to the business or transaction; or (ii) intended to incur, or believed or reasonably should have believed that he would incur, debts beyond his ability to pay as they became due.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “present[ing] evidence that no documents, such as a promissory note, mortgage, or security interest supported [principal’s mother’s claim] that she had loaned money to Rowanoak.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.