Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

344 F. App'x 944

Young v. Holder

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided September 21, 2009

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2009-09-21

Cited by 2 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2010

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 844 (§ 404 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Carachuri-Rosendo v. Holder

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2009-09-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM: *

¶1 Lyndon Christopher Young, a citizen of Trinidad and Tobago, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). It found him to be ineligible for cancellation of removal because his 2006 New York marijuana possession conviction constituted an aggravated felony for purposes of immigration law. Young contends solely that the BIA erred by treating his conviction as equivalent to the federal offense of “recidivist possession.” See 21 U.S.C. § 844(a).

¶2 We conclude that the BIA correctly determined that Young’s offense constituted an aggravated felony for immigration law purposes. See Carachuri-Rosendo v. Holder, 570 F.3d 263, 266-68 (5th Cir.2009), petition for cert. filed (July 15, 2009) (No. 09-60).

¶3 PETITION DENIED.

*

¶4 Pursuant to 5th Cir R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

/344/fappx/944 · .json · Public domain