344 N.J. Super. 211 - White v. White’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
7 district · 5 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2510 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986)
Relies on Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · State v. Hempele · United States v. Turk · Hennessey v. Coastal Eagle Point Oil Co. · Steve Jackson Games Incorporated v. United States Secret Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A person is guilty of a crime of the fourth degree if he (1) knowingly accesses without authorization a facility through which an electronic communication service is provided or exceeds an authorization to access that facility, and (2) thereby obtains, alters, or prevents authorized access to a wire or electronic communication while the communication is in electronic storage. [ N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-27(a)].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“consents to another's access to its computer network, it cannot claim that such access was unauthorized.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“communication[s]... in electronic storage.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.