Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

344 Or. App. 577

State v. I. G.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 29, 2025

This page is marked noindex.

Court of Appeals of Oregon · decided 2025-10-29

Applies OR 2 § 2.570 · OR 426 § 426.005 · OR 426 § 426.130

Affirmed · Decided 2025-10-29

No. 945              October 29, 2025                577

  This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion
   pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited
        except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).

          IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE
                  STATE OF OREGON

                   In the Matter of I. G.,
          a Person Alleged to have Mental Illness.
                   STATE OF OREGON,
                        Respondent,
                              v.
                           I. G.,
                         Appellant.
             Multnomah County Circuit Court
                   24CC07041; A186132

  Monica M. Herranz, Judge.
  Submitted September 12, 2025.
  Liza Langford filed the brief for appellant.
  Jona J. Maukonen, Assistant Attorney General, waived
appearance for respondent.
  Before Lagesen, Chief Judge, and Egan, Judge.
  LAGESEN, C. J.
  Affirmed.
578                                                           State v. I. G.

           LAGESEN, C. J.
         Appellant challenges a judgment committing him
to the custody of the Oregon Health Authority for up to 180
days. His appointed counsel filed a brief pursuant to ORAP
5.90(4) and State v. Balfour, 
311 Or 434
, 
814 P2d 1069
 (1991).
The brief does not contain a Section B. See ORAP 5.90(1)(b).
We affirm.1
         A civil commitment hearing occurred in November
2024. Based on the evidence and testimony at the hearing,
the trial court found that appellant suffered from a mental disorder and was unable to provide for his basic needs.
See ORS 426.005(1)(f)(B); ORS 426.130(1)(a)(C). Having
reviewed the record, including the trial court file and the
transcript of the civil commitment hearing, and having
reviewed the Balfour brief, we have identified no arguably
meritorious issues.
           Affirmed.




   1
     As authorized by ORS 2.570(2)(b), this matter is determined by a two-judge
panel.

/344/orapp/577 · .json · Public domain