Stallings v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1959
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 1969
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 96 Okla. Crim. 53 - Cawley v. State · 81 Okla. Crim. 114 - Hunt v. State · 57 Okla. Crim. 230 - Garrison v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““An application for continuance on the ground of want of time to prepare for trial, is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and the ruling of that court will not be disturbed on appeal, unless an abuse of discretion is shown.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hay v. State · Borrelli v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.