Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 344 SO2D 1219 - Luker v. State

Luker v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
November 1987
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Faretta v. California · 46 Ala. App. 722 - Parks v. State · 55 Ala. App. 88 - Bass v. State · Boswell v. State · 48 Ala. App. 726 - Eady v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “". . . The sentence prescribed and imposed was authorized by the law under which appellant was prosecuted. The evidence disclosed that he was a multiple drug convicted felon. This was his third narcotic conviction and the sentence was authorized by Title 22, Section 258 (53) Code of Alabama 1940. . . ."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.