Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 344 So. 2d 311 - State v. Williams

344 So. 2d 311 - State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 1978
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 305 So. 2d 161 - Rubiera v. Dade County Ex Rel. Benitez · Division of Bond Finance of the Department of General Services v. Rainey · 287 So. 2d 415 - State v. Williams · 294 So. 2d 418 - State v. Vinson · 344 So. 2d 284 - Tucker v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Effect of Mistrial, Order of New Trial. A person who is to be tried again shall be brought to trial within 90 days from the date of declaration of a mistrial by the trial court, the date of an order by the trial court granting a new trial, the date of an order by the trial court granting a motion in arrest of judgment, or the date of receipt by the trial court of a mandate, order, or notice of whatever form from an appellate or other reviewing court which makes possible a new trial for the defendant, whichever is last in time.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “... to stay the Speedy Trial Rule, as set forth in Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.191, for the period of time necessary to complete appellate procedures instituted in the above-styled cause. (Emphasis supplied)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.