Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 344 SO2D 565 - Belote v. State

Belote v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 1986
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 271 So. 2d 148 - Kilgore v. State · 85 So. 2d 613 - Meade v. State · 263 So. 2d 282 - Spencer v. State · 222 So. 2d 191 - Johnson v. State · 229 So. 2d 592 - Nadell v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Limits motion for consolidation to defendant and provides that defendant waives his right to consolidation by failing to file a timely motion. Under standards relating to joinder of offenses and defendants, the prosecution may avoid the necessity for consolidation by charging offenses and defendants in a single indictment or information where consolidation is permissible... . (emphasis supplied)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(b) Two or more indictments or informations charging related offenses shall be consolidated for trial on a timely motion by a defendant. The procedure thereafter shall be the same as if the prosecution were under a single indictment or information. A defendant's failure to timely move for consolidation constitutes a waiver of his right to consolidation. (Emphasis added).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.