Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 344 S.W.2d 9 - State v. Present

State v. Present’s Empirical Analysis

1961

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
December 1980
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently December 1980

9 state decisions

40196119701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Whitaker · State v. Sapp · State v. Butler · State v. Reece · State v. Mayberry

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The words ‘did in any way help, aid, and assist’ are complained of. Counsel state that the court should have specified what aiding and helping would have been sufficient, but that, by the use of this ‘indiscriminate’ term, it left the jury to speculate and consider any remote type of help and even to supply to its own ideas.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““It would be virtually impossible to hypothesize in an instruction every possible fact which might constitute a means of help or assistance, and the recital of some but not all of these would certainly be claimed to be objectional.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.