Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 345 A.2d 509 - State v. MacNamara

State v. MacNamara’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
3
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently July 2024

8 state decisions

50197519801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Waker v. United States · State v. Sullivan · State v. Leeman · State v. Roberts · State v. Bryce

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Notwithstanding the provisions of Title 17-A, section 4-A, any person who, while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or drugs, shall operate or attempt to operate a motor vehicle within this State shall, upon his first conviction for a violation of this section, be punished by a fine of not more than $1,000 and by imprisonment for not more than 90 days, or by both.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The Legislature, in enacting this statute, obviously recognized the dangers inherent in the operation of motor vehicles by persons whose faculties are impaired by the use of alcohol or other drugs and it intended to prohibit such operation under any and all circumstances. .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““[ajxiomatically, the lesser offense may never require proof of an element not required to prove the greater offense.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.