Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 345 F.2d 298 - Bailey v. Buskirk

Bailey v. Buskirk’s Empirical Analysis

345 F.2d 298 · 1965

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 7 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably Stanley v. Central Intelligence Agency (1981), Hass ex rel. United States v. United States (1975)

15 federal appellate · 7 district · 1 state decisions

200196519701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Feres v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We are satisfied that while the army medical corps performs mostly a function of service, it nevertheless has a command function over all officers and enlisted men who are admitted to its facilities during the period of their admission. The operations were performed by the medical officers in line of duty. It is not yet within the American legal concept that one soldier may sue another for negligent acts performed in the line of duty. * * * ” [emphasis added] Id. at 298 .”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.