Kapsalis v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
345 F.2d 392 · 1965
Citation profile
23
cited by 23 later decisions
2
states following
June 1995
most recently cited
16 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Mapp v. Ohio · Sanders v. United States · McDonald v. United States · Mitchell v. United States · United States v. Scales
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““If the failure to move for suppression of evidence operates as a waiver which precludes relief on direct appeal, it is our view that such failure forecloses relief by way of collateral attack under Section 2255.” Kapsalis v. United States, 345 F.2d 392, 394 (7th Cir. 1965).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.