Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co. v. Pleasure Island, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
345 F.2d 617 · 1965
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently April 2009
7 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Yorke v. Taylor · Yerid v. Mason · Harris v. Delco Products, Inc. · Bandera v. Donohue
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In this Commonwealth one who has been induced to enter into a contract in reliance upon a false though innocent representation of a material fact susceptible of knowledge which was made as of the party’s own knowledge and was stated as a fact and not as matter of opinion is entitled to rescission.”); Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co. v. Pleasure Island, Inc., 345 F.2d 617, 622 (1st Cir.1965) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“statements of opinion, of conditions to exist in the future, or of matters promissory in nature ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.