Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 345 F.2d 828 - Hutter v. United States

Hutter v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

345 F.2d 828 · 1965

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
August 2015
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently August 2015 · most notably Brown v. United States (1968), Finn v. United States (1977)

5 federal appellate · 1 district ·

130196519701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1201

Relies on Frank v. Maryland · 153 Ct. Cl. 557 - Furlong v. United States · Weiner v. United States · Suter v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * While the Veterans Administration’s determinations of the degree of disability are not conclusive upon this court, John Stewart Andrews, Executor et al. v. United States, 163 Ct. Cl. 126, 131-32 (1963), we do believe that the results of the medical examination given by the Veterans Administration only one month after plaintiff’s discharge are entitled to considerable weight in our review of the Correction Board’s action, especially in view of the failure of the Air Force to adequately evaluate plaintiff’s condition of hypertension * * *, [Emphasis supplied].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “. . . arbitrary, capricious, unsupported by evidence, or contrary to the laws and regulations . . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.