United States v. Vitasafe Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
345 F.2d 864 · 1965
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 5 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently September 1999 · most notably E. W. Bliss Co. v. Struthers-Dunn, Inc. (1969), United States v. Holtzman (1985)
17 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Dotterweich · National Labor Relations Board v. Express Publishing Co. · Kordel v. United States · Alcorta v. Texas · Willner v. Committee on Character & Fitness
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'at the peril of a summons for contempt' without providing any guidelines for the carrying on of a future advertising program in a manner deemed appropriate by the District Court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.