Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 345 F.2d 90 - Local 130, International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers v. McCulloch

Local 130, International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers v. McCulloch’s Empirical Analysis

345 F.2d 90 · 1965

Citation profile

63
cited by 63 later decisions
2
states following
July 2022
most recently cited

35 federal appellate · 13 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 63 later decisions — most recently July 2022 · most notably Spencer v. National Labor Relations Board (1983), Manhattan-Bronx Postal Union v. Gronouski (1965)

35 federal appellate · 13 district · 4 state decisions

2501965197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Leedom v. Kyne · Boire v. Greyhound Corp. · American Federation of Labor v. National Labor Relations Board · Moses Lake Homes, Inc. v. Grant County · McCulloch v. Sociedad Nacional De Marineros De Honduras

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * to say that there are possible infirmities in an action taken by the Board by reason of an erroneous or arbitrary exertion of its authority in respect of the facts before it is not to conclude that there is jurisdiction in the District Court to intervene by injunction. For such jurisdiction to exist, the Board must have stepped so plainly beyond the bounds of the Act, or acted so clearly in defiance of it, as to warrant the immediate intervention of an equity court * * *.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Whenever a petition shall have been filed, in accordance with such regulations as may be prescribed by the Board— ****** the Board shall investigate such petition and if it has reasonable cause to believe that a question of representation affecting commerce exists shall provide for an appropriate hearing upon due notice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.