Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

345 F.2d 99

Docket No. 18708.

Bell v. Anderson

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Jan. 29, 1965.

Decided March 18, 1965.

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1965-03-18

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 1965

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on United States v. Hayman · Smith v. United States · McGann v. United States

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1965-03-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Mr. E. Fontaine Broun (appointed by this court), Washington, D. C., for appellant.

¶2Mr. John A. Terry, Asst. U. S. Atty., with whom Messrs, David C. Acheson, U. S. Atty., and Frank Q. Nebeker and William H. Collins, Jr., Asst. U. S. Attys., were on the brief, for appellees.

¶3Before Bazelon, Chief Judge, and Bastían and Weight, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Appellant received a sentence of from one to three years, the maximum allowed by the statute, after pleading guilty to attempted robbery.1 No appeal from his conviction was taken, but a petition for writ of habeas corpus 2 was filed wherein appellant alleged his right to release from custody because he had been denied a speedy trial. After the District Court issued a rule to show cause and appellees filed a return and answer thereto, the rule was discharged and the petition for the writ was dismissed. This appeal followed.

¶6Pretermitting the question as to whether or not the right to a speedy trial may be raised collaterally,3 under the opinion of this court in Smith v. United States, 118 U.S.App.D.C. 38, 331 F.2d 784 (1964) (en banc), no right to relief is shown.4

¶7Affirmed.

¶8BASTIAN, Circuit Judge, concurs in the result.

/345/f2d/99 · .json · Public domain