Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 345 F.3d 338 - In the Matter Of: Coho Resources, Inc.

In the Matter Of: Coho Resources, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
3
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

1 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently March 2025

1 district · 3 state decisions

110200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 362

Relies on Soares v. Brockton Credit Union · Sikes v. Global Marine, Inc. · Texas v. United States · Picco v. Global Marine Drilling Co. · Owaski v. Jet Florida Systems, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) a discharge in a case under this title— (2) operates as an injunction against the commencement or continuation of an action ... to collect, recover or offset any such [discharged] debt as a personal liability of the debtor, whether or not discharge of such debt is waived. (e) Except as provided in subsection (a)(3) of this section, discharge of a debt of the debtor does not affect the liability of any other entity on, or the property of any other entity for, such debt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Courts disagree, however, as to the effect of violations of this automatic stay. Some courts hold that acts in violation of the stay are void ab initio and incurable. We adhere to the view that violations are merely “voidable” and are subject to discretionary “cure.” This position rests on the bankruptcy court’s statutory power to annul the automatic stay, i.e., to “lift the automatic stay retroactively and thereby validate actions which otherwise would be void.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “This [latter] position rests on the bankruptcy court's statutory power to annul the automatic stay, i.e., to lift the automatic stay retroactively and thereby validate actions which otherwise would be void.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.